Diablo 2 and even Diablo 1 had a much darker and horrific aesthetic than Diablo 3. Diablo 3 went in a bit of a different direction with the art style that they wanted to use. And whereas in Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 everything felt very horrifying, scary, very dreadful, it was borderline horror in the genre because of the amount of gore and blood Stop and kill the Countess, Andariel, and Mephisto a bunch for good drops, and you'll both level up and find great gear that helps when Nightmare gets tough (Diablo/Ancients/Baal) Try to get to around lvl 70 before starting Hell, and (depending on char class) make sure you 1. Kill stuff 2. Have 800-1200 life 3. Blizzard Entertainment said that Diablo IV is taking inspiration from every past entry in the franchise, but it’s hard to not feel like it’s distancing itself a bit from Diablo III. Diablo IV So, to answer your question, Diablo II does indeed work in relatively the same way in that monster levels slowly increase from act to act, whether this means that any given act is easier than the previous (especially when comparing Act I of a harder difficulty to Act V of an easier difficulty) depends entirely on the character's build. Share. It would be exhilarating and maybe even a little bit terrifying. Same thing with difficulty spikes. You want to occasionally hit the player with unreasonable spikes in difficulty to make them scramble and struggle. Diablo 2 did this a few times such as the Duriel fight and moving to higher difficulty, but Diablo 3 hardly did this. In Normal mode, which I also like, its mainly about the meta game. You can suck at Diablo and still do well in normal because you understand the meta game. In Hardcore, you have to actually execute well, 100% of the time, or risk losing your character forever. vEnwuM. I felt the nerfs on the fire sorc build, but I switched to the Chain Lightning build and I'm absolutely fucking shit up harder than I ever did on beta. I don't think the world is significantly harder, but it might feel that way for a lot of people given the balance changes to the most-played builds. realrufus777 • 3 mo. ago. For Diablo II: Resurrected on the PlayStation 4, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Are trophies harder or easier than in Diablo 3 on PS 4 ?". Regardless of what you think about which game is better than what. The facts of the matter are clear. Every single Diablo but this one is has a replayable campaign (I forget if 1 can but lets be honest, it was like 1995 and it was the foundation for the entire series). Diablo 4 does not have that option. Diablo 3 you could play it again and again on harder difficulties. Some bosses only Diablo 3 was seasonal but starting over each time was less grueling because its campaign is considerably shorter than those of Diablo 2 and Diablo 4. RELATED: Diablo 4 Is A Semi-MMO, But It PoE is a trade-oriented game, while D3 is a no-trade game. Generally speaking I prefer trade-oriented games (like d2 with d2jsp or early D3 with the auction). I didn't like the decision to cut off the trade from D3 and to implement "smart drop" mechanics instead. But surprisingly, this decision in a way saved the game.

is diablo 2 harder than diablo 3