The thing is no matter what settings or resolution i run it at I get the same fps. running it on 1280x1024 on my monitor atm and tried it all low at 800x600 and the fps were the same as the game maxed at 1280x1024 so it has to be the cpu bottle necking. Anyways these are the process's that task manger shows running that you asked to see. Dual Wielding: a guide. Over the course of Valhalla, I have come to realize that not every weapon is better in dual wield, and so in my 350-odd hours, I've decided upon the weapons that function far better when used in dual wield, and the ones that don't need it. The ones that work better in dual wield will just be listed, while the ones that Yea I used you have 2 on my number one spot, but I just replayed both games the last 2 weeks and I gotta say brotherhood improves on quite literally everything. I think I like ezio characterization more in 2 because he has more growth, but from side content to main story mission structure, and combat brotherhood is much more fun to play now a days. Assassin's Creed Odyssey allows players to pick between Alexios and Kassandra as the protagonist of the game, with one option emerging as the clear winner. Considering that Assassin's Creed Odyssey will last at least 42 hours if players only focus on the main story, players may want to know if one sibling is better than the other. Although Assassin's Creed: Valhalla explored Viking history and, as is Assassin's Creed tradition, mixes in a healthy amount of mythology for you to explore, discover, and battle. God of War: Ragnarok finishes the two-part Norse era of Kratos' journey, and focuses much more on the nine realms and the gods who control and influence them. AC2 is still pretty repetitive, IMO, but it could be worth playing. AC3, AC4, and Rogue are more varied and improved. #2. IntrepidSkin May 1, 2017 @ 2:24pm. II improves a ton and is the most critically-acclaimed so yes it should be way better. Follow ups Brotherhood and Revelations are also up there. #3. MgcPh. A few more contrivances notwithstanding, Assassin's Creed II is a better game than its forebear and is a beautiful and memorable experience on its own terms. But it's more than just a game--it's Assassin's Creed: Mirage is a love letter to the older Assassin's Creed games, with a tighter map that consists of far less bloat and more individuality. Baghdad feels alive and bustling, unlike Hoping to get some feedback. Started Assassin's Creed 1 a few times, got maybe 2-3 hours in, and eventually either had a new PC or lost my saves. Finally ready to play some AC again, but wondering if it's even worth it to play AC1? I've heard 2 is much better, so thinking about maybe skipping 1 altogether. Agreed. Unity was the last true assassins creed game, the rest since have just been historical rpgs banking off of the brand name. unity is fantastic and should get a remaster. The PC version running at 4K still looks incredible and even better than Valhalla on PS5 IMO. The amount of NPCs is breathtaking as well. The assassin interception missions, battles and the hunting challenges are better than 'catching the courier' etc and straight assassinations in Black Flag. No janky diving missions in Rogue. They also tidied up the 'optional objectives' into fun challenges rather than chores, so no more having to repeat a level just because a shark attacked

is assassin's creed 2 better than 1