Battlefield is primarily a multiplayer game that happens to also have a single player mode (for now) If you really want to play battlefield and get the real experience of the game, you absolutely need to play the multiplayer, and like every real game, you can't do that without a playstation plus membership. I would say yes if its not at full price. I paid 20€ for it and i play it every few days with 2 friends and we mostly have fun with it. A lot of the maps are very bad imo but you can still have fun with it, especially with friends. Playing it on your own is 50/50 for me, sometimes fun and sometimes not fun. It’s worth getting but it isn’t definitively ‘better’ than FH4. Tbh, that’s probably a bigger compliment to 4 than it is an insult to 5. The whole series is so strong and they all offer something different. I could happily go back to 4 after playing 5 and vice-versa. and1metal. If you want to get into battlefield I think it’s worth it, especially if you have buddies to play with. Just note that if you have anything less than a 1080 for a GPU, remember to dust your fans and maybe do some graphical changes to the standard settings. Battlefield 5 isnt actually that bad (apart from the cheaters) As a whole, its a great game and very immersive. Bf1 crashing zepps were more epic, but some of the scenes that happen in 5 are immense. Biggest complaint i hear from people is the fact they dont like the scopes. Idk, I feel like BFV’s Time to kill is really quick, so it can be unenjoyable at times. Enlisted looks pretty fun tbh. Hero’s and Generals is another F2P, and that game is a ton of fun. It’s a WW2 based FPS as well. Enlisted has a stupid F2P grind, but Battlefield 5 is so broken that I personally enjoy enlisted more. bcUo7D. If you want better answers, go to the 2042 subreddit where people who actually play the game can help. To give a real answer, yeah it's a good deal at it's current price if you can get it for 15-20$ on sale. The game when it launched was terrible and some people have been unable to get over that negative cognitive load and see the game for what I absolutely agree, but others can be put off by such a thing (loads of my friends dislike bf1 and 5 for their setting) but there are loads of reasons he could be put off. I'm a huge battlefield fan and I'm personally put off from 2042 from what I've seen gameplay wise but ill try the beta at least Yeah I think it's worth it 50% off. I recommend the base game. No need for special editions or season pass. Performance is better for me and the new map is fun on both gamemodes. I actually got hooked on Breakthrough and I've always been a Conquest main on previous Battlefield games. Originally posted by Jez: BF1 has a significantly smaller playerbase, so you won't find people playing the side modes. BF5's playerbase is bigger, but many of the side modes also remain untouched. According to Steam Charts, BF1 has a 30 day average of 13k players, while BFV has a 30 day average of 16k players. On PC: Ultimate Edition: $109.99, €109,99, £99.99 (USD / EURO / GBP) We wanted to get the price out of the way first, so it doesn't give you such a shock later. It's expensive, we know. Perhaps one of the most expensive games we've seen, but this is 2021 and next-gen is this–gen.

is battlefield 5 worth buying